In politics, there are two types of candidates: those who run to win and those who run to work. Over the last 16 years, Vermonters have been lucky to have a representative in the U.S. House of Representatives who knows the real goal of running isn’t winning but working every day on behalf of Vermonters.

I dreamt an alligator ate my dog whole. When I told my husband about my nightmare, he thought it was all about vulnerability. Or, more accurately, fear of vulnerability.

Every commencement season Poor Elijah waits in vain for an invitation to address a graduating class. In the meantime, he contents himself with delivering his remarks on my porch.

The overarching reason I’ve decided to run for Senate is because my years of experience in Africa have taught me that the democratic process thrives with healthy competition.

Teaching other people’s children is a weighty responsibility. Teachers are trustees. The children in my classroom aren’t mine to mold the way I want them. I’m uncomfortable advocating an opinion their parents wouldn’t want them to hold.

In this very difficult time for our country and the world, I am running for Congress in the Democratic primary to replace Rep. Peter Welch.

I was away when news of the U.S. Supreme Court leak went viral. I hadn’t watched TV for a week and barely signed onto social media but when I did, I read astute and deeply troubling reactions to the policy document designed to overturn Roe v. Wade, which has been considered established law for 50 years.

Ten years ago, after Sandy Hook, a plaintive headline begged, “Can we now talk about guns?” It was a response to the perennial Republican assertion that the grief-stricken, furious aftermath of tragedy isn’t the best time to craft firearms regulations.

The recent leak of the draft decision by the Supreme Court to overturn Roe v. Wade portends a major shift in almost 50 years of reproductive health care in America. As outrageous as it is on its face, it is a call to action for Vermont.

alert

One million. On a good day, it sounds rosy and abundant. Like one million dollars. A million-dollar smile. You look like a million bucks. Or thanks a million. But not today.

As the current deputy secretary to Jim Condos, who is retiring, I can tell you that every Vermonter, every day, is affected by the work we do.

Have an opinion? Send a letter. We do our best to get different opinions in the paper. The wider the variety of ideas, the better readers are served. A healthy letters page in the local newspaper indicates an engaged community. A difference of opinion expressed through civil discourse indicates a robust, thinking democracy. Letters should be no more than 400 words and should be submitted by 12 p.m. on the Monday before publication for The Other Paper, and by 5 p.m. for The Citizen and Shelburne News.

Email letters to news@otherpapersbvt.com, news@thecitizenvt.com or news@shelburnenews.com. We accept letters from residents and business owners within each newspaper’s coverage area. Please include your name, street address, email address and phone number so we can verify that you wrote the letter. We keep contacts confidential. Letters should not be libelous or slanderous, and will be accepted and printed at the discretion of the editor. All points should be supported with facts. Letters regarding a candidate or ballot item/issue will not be printed the week before an election. Questions? Call 802-864-6670 or 802-985-3091.

Letter Policy

Please do not send open letters, form letters, letter writing campaigns, copies of letters sent to other publications, or letters signed by a group. Letters written in response to another letter should address the topic at hand, and not the author of the letter; please refer to the headline and date of the letter to which you are responding. We do not accept letters of endorsement or complaint about individual businesses. ‘Thank you’ letters that include lists of businesses or individuals who have supported a cause, will be edited to remove the list.