To the Editor:

In a recent edition, The Other Paper published an article about a South Burlington police officer pleading guilty to a driving under the influence charge.

In the article, the newspaper identifies the complete home address of this officer, and states he happens to live with three other police officers. The article would have been complete if the reporter had written that the officer left the driveway of his Hinesburg residence, and left it at that.

When the South Burlington Police Department issues a press release on individuals arrested, only the town that the individual lives in is identified, not the individual’s home address. This is done to protect basic privacy rights of individuals who have been arrested.

I am disappointed that a member of the press would behave so irresponsibly. I am further worried that, unchecked, such behavior has the potential to result in harm to individuals who have been arrested. Ethical journalism balances the public’s need for information against potential harm or discomfort to the individual. Given the current public sentiment toward public officials in the U.S., including documented incidents of vandalism to public and private property, and physical attacks, publication of their home address is a thoughtless and potentially reckless act.

Additionally, through the newspaper’s reference to a private arraignment versus public, he implies that the officer received special treatment from the courts. In Chittenden County, many first time offenses of this nature are reduced to a charge of negligent operation with a fine around $300. This officer’s charge was not reduced and his fine and court costs were twice what are usually assessed. The officer took responsibility for, and pleaded guilty to the crime he committed.

The implication of preferential treatment is inaccurate.

The South Burlington Police Officers’ Association hopes, in the future, The Other Paper will avoid exposing anyone, including police officers, to potential harm.

Daniel Boyer


South Burlington Police Officers’ Association

(1) comment


Why did the SBPD chief called in the state troopers instead of local police?

Because he know it would take an hour or more... which helps decrease blood alcohol content?

Police chiefs and police unions are the main problems with policing. The Chief knew it would take an hour or more for a dept. other than the Hinesburg PD to respond, which helps decrease blood alcohol content. The guy was at 0.2+ after the wait. Imagine how wasted he was! Imagine if all of us had secret hearings for such inebriation!

The guy was at 0.2+ after the wait. Imagine how wasted he was! And the other half dozen So. Burlington cops in that house were also apparently highly intoxicated. It's frightening. I'm glad we know where they all live now. I'm glad we know where they all live now. They should be carefully monitored by their neighbors, as it sounds like a dangerous situation there on Texas Hill... incredibly drunken guys with guns and pickups.

Police Unions lecturing news media about "bad faith" is a rich one! :)

Welcome to the discussion.

Keep it clean. Please avoid obscene, vulgar, lewd, racist or sexual language.
Don't threaten. Threats of harming another person will not be tolerated.
Be truthful. Don't knowingly lie about anyone or anything.
Be nice. No racism, sexism or any sort of -ism that is degrading to another person.
Be proactive. Use the "Report" link on each comment to let us know of abusive posts.
Share with us. We'd love to hear eyewitness accounts, the history behind an article.